|
Post by pat perry on Mar 27, 2013 23:20:23 GMT 9
Recently, Bob Kwiecinski (aka Bobski), Chairman of the All F-106 Reunion at Dayton started receiving a bunch if emails with stories and pictures. These emails were coming from the reunion email list that was consolidated from a number of squadrons. Some members of this Forum were on that distribution but a number of them were not so I tried to post as many of these stories and pictures as possible here on the forum. It didn't take long before Bobski and I were feeling like that I Love Lucy episode where Lucy worked on a chocolate assembly line that kept getting faster and faster. She was stuffing candy in her mouth and clothing trying to keep up with the assembly line.  Well, I got behind so I copied a bunch of the emails into a document attached below. Bobski is also creating a document handout for the reunion attendees. And just so you know, there will be laptop capability at the reunion in Dayton and we can burn CDs and copy pictures onto your flash drives if you bring them. So bring pictures to the reunion (preferably digital) and we'll share them with everyone in slide shows and copy them if you want them. The emails in this 11 page document cover AMARC, MA-1 Six Mods, William Tell, the B-model front half display and some pilot experiences. Contributions include some of our Forum members. This is only a small portion of the stories that Bobski has received. Enjoy! Pat P. F-106 Reunion war stories.pdf (140.66 KB)
|
|
|
Post by pat perry on Mar 28, 2013 0:01:10 GMT 9
You all have heard me whine about WebShots.com discontinuing their photo hosting service and severing the links I had on posted on the Forum to over 5000 of my photos. Grrrr. As I was thinking about the reunion in Dayton it reminded me of our 456th FIS 2010 Reunion in Colorado Springs. Erv Smalley [RIP] and his wife Sandy hosted that reunion and it became one of the best of 9 that the 456th conducted. One of the best parts was having guys from other squadrons attend (mostly MA-1 who had been at Selfridge). We also had Bear Bruhn and the Old Sarge who both brought their fine woodworking pieces to be used for door prizes and raffle items. After we said the Pledge of Allegiance with hand over heart the Old Sarge gave us a direct reminder that we could now render hand salute while in civilian clothes. God, I love that man.  I got to know most of the Crew Chiefs, MA-1 and pilots at Castle. We worked hard and played hard. One day, we flew 106 sorties in 6 hours and 15 minutes using 16 aircraft. And on the final landing the pilots put on one heck of a formation flying show. Ah, the good times and teamwork! Now, everyone knows that Crew Chiefs and MA-1 were the largest populations of Fixers in most squadrons. Like the Old Sarge says, "We had weenies and weeeeenies", the latter indicating big shops. Well I found this picture that shows 17 MA-1 guys at Colorado Springs. Some of these guys are Forum members and some will also be at Dayton. See if you can match the names and faces. Pat P. 
|
|
|
Post by pat perry on Mar 28, 2013 0:20:45 GMT 9
Well, I just couldn't resist copying this post Bobski forwarded since it has to do with a story that is featured on the Main site here www.f-106deltadart.com/71fis_PilotlessLanding_580787.htm and has been the topic of several Forum threads over the years. Apparently Zig Stancavage had a discussion with our favorite Convair Rep Joe Sylvia and Joe was nice enough to add his summary of 58-0787 and his theory on how it landed in the snow without a pilot. I don't think we have this info captured anywhere else. Pat P. Zig IAW our conversation today here’s a narrative of what we discussed. Aircraft 58-787 was repaired at McClellan, AFB, Sacramento, CA. The lower bulkheads were replaced because of the crash damage when it landed by itself. If W-P will open the Engine compartment doors you will see the lower bulkheads are fastened with Steel Bolts not Steel Rivets used by GD/Convair when they assembled the F-106. San Antonio Depot did not feel McClellan had the capability to buck the Steel Rivets without cracking the bulkheads. That’s why Steel Bolts were used. This is the only 106 with this Steel Bolt repair. From McClellan the Aircraft was assigned to the 84th FIS at Hamilton AFB, where I was assigned at the time. The 84th had all 59 Model 106’s and this 58 Model had quite a few configuration differences. From a maintenance standpoint it was a pain at times. However, Griffis, AFB, N.Y. lost three A/C in a three month period so the 84th was tasked to provide an A/C to Griffis. This was a good transfer because Griffis had 58 Models. Another story---------why did 787 fly by itself after the Pilot ejected? Here’s my theory. Sometime before this incident Pilots were concerned that the 106 did not have a Flight Control Neutral detent. It was suggested that Take-Off Trim should be used in flight to find Neutral under a Spin situation. San Antonio agreed and a TCTO was issued to allow Take-Off Trim to be used in flight. I never did agree to this because in Take-Off Trim the Elevons are up 3 degrees, which is counter productive in a flat Spin. In a flat Spin the Pilot is trying to drop the nose over to recover airspeed. With the Elevons up 3 degrees this is a nose-up condition not a nose-down condition. In 787’s situation when the Pilot ejected the seat rocket pushed the nose over and guess what-----------the 3 degrees up-------took over and the Aircraft began flying at a nice sink rate until it greased in on the ground. It wasn’t too long after this the Take-Off Trim airborne was de-modified. Have a nice day Gentlemen! Joe Sylvia Carmichael, CA
|
|
|
Post by Mark O on Mar 28, 2013 5:21:24 GMT 9
|
|
|
Post by Mark O on Mar 29, 2013 5:06:44 GMT 9
This just hit me as one of those, "Ya never know" kind of ideas. I'm not sure how many people are familiar with the list of photos that Erv (RIP) had of photos needed to complete the collection of every F-106 ever built, but how about sending the list to all the folks signed up for the reunion?
Ya never know!
We did get a photo recently that had THREE* of these aircraft photographed IN A SINGLE SHOT, so I think it is definitely worth a try! (*57-2542, 59-0013, and 59-0017.)
Here is the list...
PHOTO HELP REQUESTS We could use some help finding or upgrading photos for these aircraft: 57-2474 57-2484 57-2488 57-2489 57-2511 57-2534 57-2542 58-0762 58-0771 58-0794 58-0798 59-0013 59-0017 59-0029 59-0039 59-0045 59-0087 59-0113 59-0120 59-0139
|
|
|
Post by bear (Deceased) on Mar 30, 2013 13:21:15 GMT 9
|
|
|
Post by pat perry on Apr 4, 2013 0:45:04 GMT 9
All F106 Troops,
Nemo passed on this fantastic website (see below link) where you can take a virtual tour of the Air Force Museum at Wright Patterson AFB. This a great way to either:
1. Attending the F106 reunion and want to pre-plan your tour. I could spend days touring that place!
OR
2. Not attending and seeing what you will be missing!
Hope you can make the 2013 F106 All Troops Reunion. Thanks Nemo!
Aim High,
|
|
|
Post by pat perry on Apr 4, 2013 10:43:57 GMT 9
Here's an email to MOW from Kevin Kennedy. Think you'll find it interesting what Kevin has collected.
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 01:39:21 -0600 To: mcgeepj2@hotmail.com Don't you hate it when you accidentally hit send on your email before your done and ready? Wow!
Anyway, the reason I wanted to get in touch with you is because, I have been a big fan and a casual visitor/ researcher of your fantastic web-site over these past few years. I really enjoy your awesome site and am impressed by all of the outstanding work and effort that you and others have contributed and share to keep it up to date.
So, now... I am hopeful that I too can maybe contribute some small part as well. As I have traveled around the Southwest, collecting bits and pieces for a small personal museum/ display, I am sometimes lucky and fortunate to come across a really unique find or 'gem' in my nostalgic hunts. Well, these things I refer to as 'gems' are definitely that for me anyways...
Several years ago, on a trip to Arizona, I found and purchased the tail fin and partial rudder off of a 49th FIS Delta Dart. What a surprise and a beautiful piece to find! The removed tail fin is at least 8' in length along the bottom and approximately 6' in height, weighing in at 300lbs plus+. The TAC Badge and green wing feathers of the 49th's Eagle are still present. Sadly, when the tail was cut off, it was allowed to just fall over, striking the ground and breaking the fragile fiber-glass top edge a bit... But, other than that, it is in remarkably good shape.
Through careful study and research, I am 99% sure that this tail fin belongs to #59-0115. As I am sure that you already know, there were only two 49th FIS Delta Darts in a group of several 106s that were sent to the Gila Bend range as targets. So, #59-0115's air frame may be gone and remembered only through memory and photographs but, her tail is still with us and I am proud to be it's care-taker... An entrusted steward of military aviation history!
Hope this was interesting for you. Thank you for your time and attention to my story. Kevin Kennedy
MOW requested pictures from Kevin
Pat P.
|
|
|
Post by pat perry on Apr 4, 2013 10:59:12 GMT 9
Here's another gem from Bobski - Pat P. All F106 Troops, Lt Col (at the time) Raymond ‘Nemo’ Niemotka from the New Jersey ANG, sent me this link regarding the F106 as the best interceptor of all time, of course we all know that! I highly recommend that you go to this site link below and read the couple pages. I was absolutely engulfed in the F106 stories and information presented. You will see "Nemo's" article in it regarding intercepting Russian Bears. In the case you can't see the link I have pasted in below, just his story from the website. I got goose bumps reading it. It's just great that we are now just hearing about stories that pilots especially, couldn't tell during the Cold War because of classified information. Now that we're all been apart for 30-40+ years it's great we can socialize at an equal level! Can't wait for the reunion!! Thanks Nemo! Aim High, Bobski Sent: 4/2/2013 5:33:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Check out F-106 Delta Dart interceptor of Air Defense Command
THOUGHT YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN THIS. THE LAST PART OF THE ARTICLE, "BEAR HUNTERS" IS ABOUT MY INTERCEPTS OF THE BEARS. PASS IT ON IF YOU WANT. SEE YA AT THE REUNION. NEMO
Text of Nemo's article from the website:
Tupolev ‘Bear’ hunters
The ultimate goal of every F-106 pilot was to take part in an intercept of a Soviet aircraft. Out over the Atlantic Ocean there occurred numerous intercepts of Soviet Tu-95 ‘Bears’ that had traversed from Russia across the frigid regions above Canada and then down the eastern seaboard to Cuba. Every one of these flights was detected early and the New Jersey and Florida ANG interceptors were ready for them when they came into their sectors. Probably one of the most prolific intercept pilots in the F-106 was Lt Col Raymond ‘Nemo’ Niemotka from the New Jersey unit His logbook shows that he made four intercepts of Tu-95s in the ‘Six’ and one while flying in the F-16 (after the unit had traded in its F-106s for the newer jet). He provides some insight into the art of the intercept in both types.
‘The 1\i-95 ‘Bears’ approached us mostly from two routes. They came in over Nova Scotia and down along the east coast headed for Cuba. The other route was from North Africa to Cuba and then north up the east coast. Separate flights were also flown north up the coast while the ‘Bears’ were still operating out of Castro country. Most of the time, we had adequate warning, usually more than two hours. The few times there was no warning, we were supposed to be airborne within five minutes. This was unrealistic, especially in the winter when we had to put on our ‘Poopy Suits’ and the water temperature was less than 55 degrees. Most of the no-warning scrambles were false!
‘The ‘Bears’ usually flew these routes in pairs with one trailing about 10 miles behind the lead. Their pilots did not do anything unusual as they just followed the coastline and they rarely turned inbound, and kept a distance of from 50 to 300 miles out. Their altitude varied between 10,000 and 30,000ft. They were constantly testing our response time and whether or not we could locate them. On some occasions, they dropped sonar buoys and looked for our submarines. One time, 1 intercepted them about 50 miles off the coast of Virginia where the ‘Bears’ came to look at our new aircraft carrier, the USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70). Normally, we passed them off to the guys at Langley AFB going south and Otis AFB going north. They also had F-106s.
‘At the time of one of my last intercepts, I was pulling alert duty down at Homestead AFB in southern Florida while their squadron was transitioning into the F-16s. One morning we received a warning that the ‘Bears’ would be coming along the coast from the north. It was unusual that our fighter group intercepted the ‘Bears’ with New Jersey F-106s off the Florida coast. We were spread out from Jersey to Florida and I’m sure the Russians flying in the ‘Bear’ couldn’t figure it out.
‘Mission time varied from about one hour to over five hours, which was my longest airborne time for a ‘Bear’ intercept, flown in a new F-16 that had just replaced our ‘Sixes’. After about two hours, I told AWACS that we were approaching Bingo fuel and would be turning back inbound. They told us to hang in there because a KC-135 tanker was on its way, and a short time later we took on 12,000lb of fuel. After topping off, were proceeded to intercept two ‘Bears’ and stayed airborne for another four hours.
‘While on alert, we were armed with live weapons. The ‘Six’ normally had two radar-guided missiles and two heat-seeking missiles and an internally mounted 20mm ‘Gatling’ gun on the underside of the aircraft. The F-106 was also capable of carrying a special weapon called the Genie, which was a nuclear rocket that would travel five times the speed of sound. We had to fire these, without the warhead, once a year when we were down at AFB in Florida. It was a very impressive sight to see these launched from one of our aircraft. Supposedly, the Soviets were terrified of this weapon, and so were we because we had no idea of what would happen after our ‘escape’ manoeuvre. Of course, we had other concerns such as the fact that the Russians had ‘laser guns’ that could blind us after intercepting a ‘Bear’. We wore gold-plated visors for that, but there were no guarantees that they would work. Also, there were some concerns about having to ram a ‘Bear’ if we had expended all of our weapons.’
The Delta Dart’s long career started to wane in 1981 when the regular USAF squadrons began converting to the F-15 Eagle, with the F-106 being passed on to various Air National Guard squadrons. By 1988, the ‘Six’ had all but disappeared, but, two years prior, many of those that had been shipped off to the boneyard at Davis-Monthan AFB, Arizona were being converted to drones. Thereafter, NASA retained a small number of these delta-wing interceptors for various test projects that lasted until 1998.
There is perhaps no way better of summing up what the average F-106 pilot thought about the aircraft than with the words of 49th FIS commander Lt Col Steven B. Rogers. His squadron was the last regular Air Force unit to fly the ‘Six’. ‘Flying this fighter was like driving a vintage automobile; the minute you sat in it, you were overwhelmed by its sense of craftsmanship and class. Originally, the interceptor was built to fly high and fast. Although it was built back in the late 1950s, it still does that mission as well as any other fighter in inventory! By the time we gave up our 106s in September 1987, it was time for them to go, but all of the pilots that flew it will always have a special place in their hearts for the F-106.’ EDIT MOW: I converted that page into a .pdf file and will add it later to the There I Was page F-106 Delta Dart interceptor of Air Defense....pdf (127.79 KB)
|
|
MOW
Administrator     
Owner/Operator
Currently: Offline
Posts: 5,821 
Location:
Joined: September 2003
Retired: USAF, Civil Service
|
Post by MOW on Apr 4, 2013 17:20:04 GMT 9
Here's an email to MOW from Kevin Kennedy. Think you'll find it interesting what Kevin has collected.
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 01:39:21 -0600 To: mcgeepj2@hotmail.com Don't you hate it when you accidentally hit send on your email before your done and ready? Wow!
Anyway, the reason I wanted to get in touch with you is because, I have been a big fan and a casual visitor/ researcher of your fantastic web-site over these past few years. I really enjoy your awesome site and am impressed by all of the outstanding work and effort that you and others have contributed and share to keep it up to date.
So, now... I am hopeful that I too can maybe contribute some small part as well. As I have traveled around the Southwest, collecting bits and pieces for a small personal museum/ display, I am sometimes lucky and fortunate to come across a really unique find or 'gem' in my nostalgic hunts. Well, these things I refer to as 'gems' are definitely that for me anyways...
Several years ago, on a trip to Arizona, I found and purchased the tail fin and partial rudder off of a 49th FIS Delta Dart. What a surprise and a beautiful piece to find! The removed tail fin is at least 8' in length along the bottom and approximately 6' in height, weighing in at 300lbs plus+. The TAC Badge and green wing feathers of the 49th's Eagle are still present. Sadly, when the tail was cut off, it was allowed to just fall over, striking the ground and breaking the fragile fiber-glass top edge a bit... But, other than that, it is in remarkably good shape.
Through careful study and research, I am 99% sure that this tail fin belongs to #59-0115. As I am sure that you already know, there were only two 49th FIS Delta Darts in a group of several 106s that were sent to the Gila Bend range as targets. So, #59-0115's air frame may be gone and remembered only through memory and photographs but, her tail is still with us and I am proud to be it's care-taker... An entrusted steward of military aviation history!
Hope this was interesting for you. Thank you for your time and attention to my story. Kevin Kennedy
MOW requested pictures from Kevin
Pat P.
I added 2 of his shots of this tail into the 49th page's photo gallery www.f-106deltadart.com/49fis.htm. They are titled 590115 Tail Section #1 and 590115 Tail Section #2
|
|
|
Post by pat perry on Apr 5, 2013 8:40:55 GMT 9
MOW requested pictures from Kevin
Pat P.
I added 2 of his shots of this tail into the 49th page's photo gallery www.f-106deltadart.com/49fis.htm. They are titled 590115 Tail Section #1 and 590115 Tail Section #2 MOW I tried to put this comment on the picture page and it did not accept, so here it is: Man, how cool is that! Makes me think of the theme from JAWS. Way to go Kevin. I remember when AMARC moved the Sixes to Gila Bend as "Range Ducks". We had guys wanting to go on the range to see if they could pick up some parts. You saved a piece of history. Pat P.
|
|
MOW
Administrator     
Owner/Operator
Currently: Offline
Posts: 5,821 
Location:
Joined: September 2003
Retired: USAF, Civil Service
|
Post by MOW on Apr 5, 2013 10:02:54 GMT 9
I added 2 of his shots of this tail into the 49th page's photo gallery www.f-106deltadart.com/49fis.htm. They are titled 590115 Tail Section #1 and 590115 Tail Section #2 MOW I tried to put this comment on the picture page and it did not accept, so here it is: Man, how cool is that! Makes me think of the theme from JAWS. Way to go Kevin. I remember when AMARC moved the Sixes to Gila Bend as "Range Ducks". We had guys wanting to go on the range to see if they could pick up some parts. You saved a piece of history. Pat P. Ummm, I logged out of my admin account to be a regular viewer and added it ok.
|
|
|
Post by pat perry on Apr 5, 2013 12:23:18 GMT 9
All F106 Troops, Some of you may have heard the news today about the closing of some of the galleries at the Air Force Museum. This is very disappointing news, but the reunion will go on. As most of you know, Ken Wigton and I will be going down for a couple days (April 17 & 18) to meet with the Hope Hotel management, Green County Visitors Bureau, Air Force Museum management, and every activity we will be doing, to firm up our schedules, menus, and venues. We will let you all know as soon as we solidify everything. Aim High! Bob Kwiecinski (Bobski) Sent: 4/4/2013 10:29:33 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Cuts Force AF Museum to close Some Galleries
Bobski, Just saw this today at
This may impact our plans slightly but not a showstopper unless the entire museum is shut down. Probably part of Sequestration actions. The two galleries closed are not a big loss but the closing of the restoration area is a bummer. Thanks,Pat Perry Text from page
Cuts Force AF Museum to close Some Galleries
Apr 3, 2013
DAYTON, Ohio - The national Air Force museum in southwest Ohio is closing some galleries starting next month due to federal budget cuts.
The director of the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force near Dayton says the presidential and research and development galleries will be closed until further notice beginning May 1.
Museum Director Jack Hudson said Tuesday popular exhibits in the affected galleries include President John F. Kennedy's Air Force One and the high-altitude 1950s bomber the XB-70 Valkyrie. He says museum officials hope to reopen those galleries as soon as possible.
The budget cuts also will end weekly tours of the museum's restoration area after April 26 and cancel some lectures and all of the summer aerospace camps.
The museum has canceled staff training and travel and is deferring non-emergency maintenance.
|
|
|
Post by pat perry on Apr 11, 2013 12:34:25 GMT 9
FYI,
Will there be any F106 troops in the San Diego area May 8-13? I will be out there those days to visit our son and his wife and our new grandson. Our son is in the Navy.
If you would like to meet for lunch or coffee while I am there let me know. We could chat about the F106 reunion.
Bob Kwiecinski
(Bobski)
Bobski9933 at aol.com
|
|
|
Post by pat perry on Apr 18, 2013 1:37:46 GMT 9
I've got about 5 more posts to attach after this one that contain some of the stories Bobski has been receiving. I'm glad he is making a file of all these for reunion attendees. There are more than I can keep up with here but I have consolidated some by themes that you will enjoy. Here's the latest Reunion Update from Bobski and an attachment showing the name of about 190 attendees. Pat P. Hello F106 Troops, Here's the latest list of the troops signed up so far for the 2013 F106 Reunion below, and also an attached file. There are still several guys who haven't paid their $10 for each person attending yet. please do so as soon as possible and send to: Zig Stancavage 45999 Royal Dr. Chesterfield, MI 48051 Ph: 586-840-5571 This Wednesday & Thursday, Ken Wigton and I will be driving down to Dayton and stay overnight, to meet up with one of our other committee members, Jerry Braun. We will meet with the Hope Hotel managers, Air Force Museum manager, Greene County Visitors Bureau, and every place on our reunion venue. We will be solidifying our schedules, menus, transportation, venues, etc. So we should have some major reunion updates coming up soon! PLEASE keep spreading the word about the reunion to every F106 Troop you have contact with. Pass on the reunion information, or give us their contact information. Remember this could be the last time you will have this opportunity!! Also you should really reserve your hotel room NOW, or as early as possible. The Wright Patterson AFB is a VERY popular area for military reunions and they will fill up well in advance. Remember if you want to stay at the Hope Hotel (main gathering area for the reunion) to ask for a room under the block held for "F106 2013 Reunion, Sept 11-15). The Hope Hotel phone number is: Reserve your room at the Hope Hotel call: (937)879-2696 (ask for F106 Reunion block). $87/night includes breakfast. Area & WPAFB campsites are also available Aim High and keep sending me stories! (see list of attendees below or attached file) Bob Kwiecinski (Bobski) F106 2013 Reunion Committee Chairperson
All F-106 Reunion Attendees 4-17-2013.pdf (62.03 KB)
|
|
|
Post by pat perry on Apr 18, 2013 1:43:21 GMT 9
Let the All F-106 reunion jokes begin – Pat P.All F106 Troops, Jack Krause sent me this cute joke about maintenance monkeys, see further down. He gave me permission to pass this on to all of you. Thanks Jack! Bobski This joke was sent me by a C-130 pilot, retired colonel ops type, once stationed at McChord. If you think this joke might not be appreciated by an ops type pilot,that is good. However, I can see where you might not want to alienate anybody in the operations field as you are trying (valiantly) to establish this "fraternity" of all F-106 troops. I ran across a "few" pilots in my career who would not take it kindly. FYI, I flew the F-106 660 hours with 65 "trips" out to Mach 2. I was a flight line maintenance officer and FCF pilot at O'Hare (F-86D/L); an FCF pilot at Harmon (F-102/ T-33); flight line officer at McGuire (F-106/T-33); established the first formal F-106 pilot ground school at Tyndall and FCF pilot for the F-106/T-33; FCF pilot for the A-1E and A-26 at Hurlburt and Nakon Phanom; FCF pilot for the T-33 at Andrews/Pentagon, Chief of Maintenance and FCF pilot for the T-33 at Loring; and Chief of Maintenance at McChord and FCF pilot for the F-106 and T-33. I retired from the USAF with 5,600 hours of single engine prop fighter/jet/jet fighter/ prop attack hours. So you see where I come from as far as being "reticent" about hurting ”pilots” feelings. (Quit flying two years ago after 56 years accumulating 21,133 hours in 100 different airplanes.) Phew, got tired out after all that hot air. Sorry. I’m getting to be one of those blowhard octogenarians. Please use your usual good judgment. Feel free to sign my name if you do send it out so I can get in some last digs. (Don't want to tick off those ops types.) Your good work is truly appreciated. Jack Krause Maintenance Monkeys...A tourist walked into a pet store and was looking at the animals on display. While he was there, a Chief Master Sergeant (CMSGT) from the local Air Force base walked in and said to the shopkeeper, “I’ll take a maintenance monkey, please.” The man nodded, went to a cage at the side of the store, and took out a monkey. He put a collar and leash on the animal and handed it to the CMSGT, saying, “That’ll be $5,000.” The CMSGT paid and left with the monkey. Surprised, the tourist went to the shopkeeper and said, “That was a very expensive monkey. Most of them are only a few hundred dollars. Why did that one cost so much?” The shopkeeper answered, “Ah that was a maintenance monkey. He can rig aircraft flight controls, score 95 on USAF Career Development Course tests, and perform the duties of any maintenance officer with no back talk or complaints. It’s well worth the money.” The tourist spotted a monkey in another cage. “That one’s even more expensive at $10,000! What does it do?” “Oh, that one is a ‘Maintenance Supervisor’ monkey! It can instruct at all levels of maintenance, supervise maintenance at the unit, intermediate, and Depot level, and even do most of the paperwork. A very useful monkey indeed,” replied the shopkeeper. The tourist looked around a little longer and found a third monkey in a cage. The price tag read, “$100,000.” The shocked tourist exclaimed, “That one costs more than all the others put together! What in the world could it do?” "Well, I’ve never actually seen him do anything but drink beer and play with his pecker, but his papers say he’s a pilot.” 
|
|
|
Post by pat perry on Apr 18, 2013 1:45:52 GMT 9
FCF StoriesFrom: mcnab320@hotmail.com To: bobski9933@aol.com Sent: 4/14/2013 5:33:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: RE: F106 - For Maintenance Folks. Would Jack Krause like to relate some of his more "interesting" FCFs in any of the aircraft he flew, but, especially the F-106? As a former Functional Check Flight (FCF) pilot myself, I had several flights that developed into exciting flights when crap started going wrong. Mr. Krause's background is extensive. I think many of us would like hearing about his most memorable flights. Jim McNab, Maj, Retired Fresno, California Air National Guard F-106 (1975-1983) From: jkrause54@msn.com To: bobski9933@aol.com, mcnab320@hotmail.com Sent: 4/14/2013 11:52:23 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: RE: F106 - For Maintenance Folks. You know? We had such good maintenance in the F-106 units I flew with that I cannot remember any serious problems on an FCF. Nice try though.  , I do remember one flight. Nothing dire. One of my very first FCFs back in '61. As you may remember there was a problem coming out of A/B once up to Mach 2 because of the coordination of the inlet vanes and afterburner nozzles. If you didn't slow way down and use great care, coming out of A/B at high Mach meant inducing tremendous (and spine tingling) compressor stalls. The problem was eventually with the installation of a delay switch twixt the two entities. I was a young lieutenant new to the squadron, but I was right out of maintenance school with no F-106 time. (800+ in the F-102) I managed to finagle an FCF slot, but all the ops FCF types were very closed mouth about how to really conduct one. Finally one day, when I told one of them of my problems coming out of AB about M1.8, he said. Easy, just pull up slow to down before moving the throttle. I did. The next thing I saw was 67,000' flat on my back indicating 184 knots and Mach 1.4. No pressure suit. Nice guys. Oh, I did shoot out my fuel control system and nose gear extension on takeoff in a F-86L at O'Hare. That story was published in the "Friends" Journal of the USAF Museum. Actually, the Chief Pilot in the Sky was extremely good to me. I only lost one engine in a single, but got it back again, and one in a twin. What kind of tales would you be willing to relate? Thanks for asking. Jack Krause From: brugor@me.com To: Bobski9933@aol.com Sent: 4/15/2013 9:57:14 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: F106 FCF story - Gordon Krause's FCF story brings reminds me of my own: I was a new F-106 FCF pilot for 94th FIS flying out of Selfridge AFB in 1968. This was a routine FCF (Functional Check Flight) after an engine change, and the standard routine was to take off and fly north up Lake Huron. We would climb to the coldest temperature (just below the stratosphere) and accelerate to Mach 2. We reached Mach 2 at the north end of Lake Huron, came out of afterburner and turned back south toward Selfridge. We descended and performed many checks, ending with using the autopilot for a "hands off" instrument landing system (ILS) approach to within 300 ft altitude (minimum altitude in weather) where we took over and landed the plane. Takeoff, climb, and acceleration were going well. I noted that at Mach 1.2 that hydraulic pressure jiggled as the Variable Ramps were activated, which was normal. The Vari-Ramps were in the engine intakes and extended, starting at Mach 1.4, keeping the shock wave from hitting the engine compressor blades. A shock wave has supersonic air on one side and subsonic air on the other side, so the compressor blades would have only subsonic air to work with. As I reached Mach 1.8, accelerating in full afterburner, I heard a strange hum, which got louder. Suddenly there was a BANG! BANG! and the plane skidded sideways at Mach 1.8! I thought I had lost a compressor blade and the engine might come apart at any moment. I knew I couldn't eject at that speed - the air pressure would tear me to pieces! I came out of afterburner and slowed down, turning back for Selfridge. Everything seemed normal. I landed without incident, and talked to the engine men and with the Hughes Tech Rep. They found a note in the F-106 Dash One flight manual -- if the Air Data Computer sends the wrong signal to the Vari-Ramps, they let supersonic air hit the compressor blades. The compressor blades can't digest supersonic air, so they belch it back through the other intake, making the plane yaw violently. It seldom does any damage. They called it "STALL BUZZ". Some buzz! It scared the hell out of me! Another FCF flight from Selfridge -- On the final approach to land at Selfridge, I switched on the ILS. We always flew FCFs in good weather, so the instrument landing system was just to test it. I then engaged the autopilot and it locked onto the ILS signal and began a normal approach to the field as I sat back and watched. At about 800 feet above the ground, the autopilot suddenly rolled the plane UPSIDE DOWN and dove for the ground! In an instant, I pushed the EMERGENCY DIRECT MANUAL button, shut off the autopilot, and recovered from the inverted position. Just a routine write-up in the 781 maintenance form - but I never again trusted the autopilot to fly an approach in bad weather.... Bruce Gordon
|
|
|
Post by pat perry on Apr 18, 2013 1:47:33 GMT 9
F-106 Aerial combat maneuvering (this goes well with past threads we’ve had on comparisons of F-106 performance to F-4, F-104, etc. – Pat P.
From: brugor@me.com To: Bobski9933@aol.com Sent: 4/17/2013 12:26:37 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: F-106 Aerial Combat Maneuvering #1
The F-106 was designed to attack bombers, and little thought was given to fighter maneuvers. During the Vietnam War, the Air Force Academy got involved in the mathematics of fighter maneuvers to develop better maneuvers and better aircraft designs. They determined that thrust/weight and wing loading (pounds of weight per square foot of wing area) were crucial parameters. The Russian MIG-21 was giving our F-4s a hard time, so the Air Force Academy checked to see if any American fighters had a thrust/weight and a wing loading similar to the MIG-21. The F-106 was most like the MIG-21.
The famous Fighter Weapons School at Nellis AFB asked for four F-106s to practice against. They got four aircraft and six pilots from the 94th FIS at Selfridge, who flew to Nellis. Our pilots were shown two good movies showing F-100 Super Sabre tactics, and were then sent off to battle with the best that Nellis could offer. Our planes pretended to be MIG-21s and pretended to have guns, so it was a fighter vs. fighter, get-on-his tail kind of thing between F-106s and F-4s.
For the first week, those great pilots from Nellis had our ass. Then we began to learn how to fly at the edge of the performance envelope. The F-106's delta wing had a lighter wing loading than the F-4, so we could out-turn them. We learned to use only rudders, not elevons, in turns, to avoid Adverse Yaw (more about Adverse Yaw over a beer at our September reunion!). We learned that, in full afterburner, we could pull the stick hard back, then apply full rudder, and the plane would pitch up and roll. During this "rudder reversal" the F-106 would lose hundreds of knots of speed in seconds, and we'd be riding the turn on our afterburner. The F-106 would be very close to a spin, but could be controlled if you were very careful. If it got close to a spin, the nose would start to "hunt", moving from side to side, and then would snap into a violent spin. Few F-106s ever recovered from a spin, as it tended to spin flat. The tech manual says it takes a minimum of 20,000 feet to recover from a spin -- that's how we lost at least one F-106 at Selfridge. If you were very gentle with the F-106 when its nose started to hunt, you could avoid the flat spin!
The Nellis F-4s were shocked when they attacked an F-106, only to have it do this sudden "rudder reversal" and almost stop in mid-air. The F-4 would go screaming past, and the F-106 would roll over on his tail! We had no airspeed, but if the F-4 turned to re-attack, we cut him off in the turn and "shot him down". After the first week, the air over Nellis belonged to the F-106s, and Headquarters started plans for using F-106s in Vietnam.
We started a serious program of Aerial Combat Maneuvering, ACM (also called Aerial Combat Tactics, ACT) at Selfridge. Then we flew down to Tyndall, where they had F-104s. Those were very exciting missions! Two F-101 fighters pretended to be a "strike force" going into Vietnam, low altitude, high speed. We had four F-106s to "protect" the F-101s. We flew at .95 Mach, subsonic so we didn't use the afterburners (saving fuel) and we could turn better when subsonic than when supersonic. Then four F-104s, pretending to be MIG-21s, would attack us.
The F-104s were extremely fast and small, but had very poor radar and could not turn well. Ground radar constantly gave them our position, but told us nothing about them, so we had to use our radar and wits to be ready for an F-104 attack. They always managed to get behind us. We kept looking behind us until our necks were stiff! When we saw the F-104s, those little guys were behind us and closing at nearly Mach 2. If we saw them, we could turn hard and they'd overshoot our turn, then dive away, using their great speed to get away. If we didn't see them, they came back with gun camera films with their pipper on an F-106.
One mission that I flew -- I saw an F-104 closing, turned hard, forcing him to overshoot. I reversed my turn and was on his tail, in full afterburner. The F-104 dove for more speed, as I accelerated behind him -- at Mach 1.8 I locked my radar onto him, but he was pulling away from me at about 200 knots! The steering dot was at the bottom of the scope as the F-104 dove away ... but then the dot started to move up ... toward the top of the scope ... and my radar target circle switched from a negative overtake to an overtake of 600, then 800 knots! I couldn't see the F-104 because he was too far away, but my radar told me that he had pulled up sharply, was doing an Immelmann turn at the top, and looping over to come back into the fight! I pulled up toward him, centered the dot, and got a missile "kill" as he came back toward me.
The F-106 proved to be such a great fighter vs. fighter aircraft that Headquarters ordered that F-106s be modified to carry Gatling guns. By that time, though, I had been transferred to F-100s and was in Vietnam dropping napalm & strafing in support of our ground troops....
Bruce Gordon
|
|
|
Post by pat perry on Apr 18, 2013 1:50:05 GMT 9
WSEM stories
In a message dated 4/15/2013 10:47:34 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, pketchum@twcny.rr.com writes: There was a story – don’t know just how true it was – that went around the 456 FIS about our FCF pilot, Milt [Merle] Gresham. Seems that he had to do an FCF on a 106 and needed to qualify a WSEM. So he headed out over the Pacific. Couldn’t find any airborne “targets” but he did see a fishing boat plying the waves. The story goes that he made a slow-speed pass over the boat and could see the crew waving up at him. He went around and made another pass, this time extending the rails with the WSEM attached. Said he could see guys jumping off the boat. Like I said, I don’t know how true it all was, but it made a good story. Paul Ketchum
From: lberry1@woh.rr.com To: Bobski9933@aol.com Sent: 4/16/2013 2:21:36 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: RE: F106 WSEM story - Ketchum
I heard the same story, but it was a Tyndall Pilot. I actually read WSEM tapes from pilots making runs on Ship/Cars. They weren’t able to qualify rail because of the altitude. Sea level isn’t an allowable altitude and the A/S for target was also off. But the missile would have launched and possibly hit the ground target. At Tyndall myself as well as several MA-1 troops made ground WSEM/MSR shots of incoming A/C. Just had to bypass Nose Wheel switch and lock on and let system track inbound. Again, not a good read out as A/S for F-106 was zero. But it tested the rest of system including Radar lock and tracking/IR tracking. We always had a lot of traffic at Tyndall with all fighters as well as the T-38 students.
Lorin
From: clanpotter@aol.com To: Bobski9933@aol.com Sent: 4/16/2013 6:38:32 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Re: F106 WSEM story - Lorin While I was s made a successful WSEM pass on an ore boat to test out the AMTI (automatic Moving target indicator if I remember right.) The story was that there were complaints phoned in before he got back to base. Anyone else remember the story and maybe some details? Dell
From: Cornbndr@aol.com To: Bobski9933@aol.com CC: clanpotter@aol.com, jnjsmart@yahoo.com, ekratochvil@tribune.com Sent: 4/17/2013 1:37:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Re: F106 WSEM story - Merchant Bob, after additional reflection, I don't believe the Bunker Hill story is accurate. I was at SAFB from 62-64. We were deployed to BHAFB for a few months during the summer of '63 while the SAFB runways were overhauled. BHAFB was a SAC base flying B-58s at the time. No other 106s there. One B-58 crashed on the runway during night ops shortly after we arrived and all crew perished. Ore boats were regular targets of convenience for 106s at SAFB, but I don't know on what lake(s).
From: merch42@centurytel.net To: Bobski9933@aol.com Sent: 4/16/2013 3:42:45 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Re: F106 WSEM story - Ketchum
Hey Bobski,
I heard the same story only it was said to be a pilot from the 319th (We get ours at night) night fighters at Bunker Hill, In. It supposedly happened on Lake Michigan about 1962.
Another good story was, when we were flying low level sorties during an ORI inspection. Apparently three birds had orders to intercept targets in the Chicago area. They were supposedly flying at Mach I, they asked if they should break off, and were given permission to intercept and gain altitude immediately. The low level pass was said to cause about a half million dollars and jammed the Chicago switchboards. I think this one is true, can anyone confirm either of them?
Tom Merchant 61-65 Bunker Hill, Selfridge, and Niagara Falls.
Bob, if I recall, the debrief form filled out after the flight indicated direction of the target (left to right or vice-versa) and speed. Often, they were ore boats plying the great lakes and speed was about 3 knots. Those guys were regular targets. It wouldn't surprise me that there were regular complaints received by base ops. Ted
|
|
|
Post by pat perry on Apr 18, 2013 1:51:23 GMT 9
F-106 in Korea story
I remember the loss of the bird at Osan, Korea, in 1969.
It was one of our younger pilots. He got an Active Air Scramble against some Russian plane coming toward Korea from Vladivostok, over the Sea of Japan. In the excitement of the scramble, he neglected his routine fuel checks until the Russian turned home and so did our F-106s. He had been looking only at the Totalizer, which totaled both wings, and he did not check the wings separately. One wing was not feeding. The Totalizer showed plenty of fuel, as it was counting the total fuel, including the fuel in the wing that was not feeding. By the time our pilot realized that one wing was running dry while the other wing was full of fuel, he had used up almost all the fuel in his good wing.
He realized that he was too far out over the Sea of Japan to get back to land, so he declared an emergency and requested that Air/Sea Rescue be notified. Unfortunately, we didn't have any Air/Sea Rescue available, so the request was passed to the South Korean Army. He flamed out from lack of fuel and glided as far as he could toward land. When he got low over the water, he ejected. Everything worked well, and he climbed into his life raft shortly before a South Korean Army helicopter came over to him. It did not have pontoons and did not have a rescue hoist, but they stuck a rail down so he could climb aboard. They then took him ashore. The Accident Board called this Pilot Error because the pilot failed to perform the routine checks of fuel feeding. A finding of Pilot Error in the loss of a plane pretty well ruins a pilot's career. We all sympathized with a young pilot on an exciting mission, forgetting his fuel checks and making it a far more exciting mission than he had expected!
The South Korean Army helicopter crew deserves lots of credit for flying a land-based helicopter several miles over water to rescue our pilot! They probably didn't have any water survival gear themselves, and if they had crashed they would have drowned. They risked their lives to save our pilot....
Bruce Gordon=
|
|