|
Post by Mark O on Aug 20, 2011 11:54:24 GMT 9
Time for an F-106 photo!! An internet find I saved from...uh, I don't know when or where. My comments say it's from an ANG conference at Kelly back in January 1982. Montana way in the back, CA in the middle, NJ clearly up close, and a whole bunch of Phantoms, and Corsair IIs. Neat photo albeit cloudy! Edit: This was from the May 27, 2011 "Replica in Scale" blog I frequent. I just found it again, and apologize to Mr. Friddell. This is from his collection of photos.
|
|
|
Post by Mark O on Dec 28, 2011 14:36:36 GMT 9
Time for another cool F-106 photo I found somewhere on the interwebby! Looks like a gorgeous day over the Atlantic! Seems like the 119th FIS made a bunch of these "artsy" shots. (Note the red tail hook, and that she's sans external tanks!) I like!
|
|
MOW
Administrator
Owner/Operator
Currently: Offline
Posts: 5,822
Location:
Joined: September 2003
Retired: USAF, Civil Service
|
Post by MOW on Dec 28, 2011 18:54:09 GMT 9
Time for another cool F-106 photo I found somewhere on the interwebby! Looks like a gorgeous day over the Atlantic! Seems like the 119th FIS made a bunch of these "artsy" shots. (Note the red tail hook, and that she's sans external tanks!) I like! That's a nice shot :2thumbsup
|
|
|
Post by Mark O on Jan 7, 2012 13:42:37 GMT 9
Not a Guard Six, but not from an active squadron either. Either way, neither way, whatever way, it's time for a Six pix!!! Five bonus points for anyone who knows what all those little splotches are on the plane. Ten bonus points if you know what the original tail number was. Cheating is allowed, and encouraged!! :rofl
|
|
MOW
Administrator
Owner/Operator
Currently: Offline
Posts: 5,822
Location:
Joined: September 2003
Retired: USAF, Civil Service
|
Post by MOW on Jan 7, 2012 13:53:13 GMT 9
Not a Guard Six, but not from an active squadron either. Either way, neither way, whatever way, it's time for a Six pix!!! Five bonus points for anyone who knows what all those little splotches are on the plane. Ten bonus points if you know what the original tail number was. Cheating is allowed, and encouraged!! I'll stay out of this one this time, but here's something to help with what the splots might be for the rest. www.f-106deltadart.com/nasa_lightening_research.htmMark - is there a copyright on this photo? Where did you find it? I want to add it to my NASA page.
|
|
Deleted
Currently: Offline
Posts: 0
Location:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2012 14:04:00 GMT 9
would it be safe to assume that they are lighting hit points? Or was some whacko with a shot gun with big pellets just taking target practice, NAAAHHHH, maybe bird strikes,
Turkey for the masses who couldnt afford to buy a dinner in Richmond, their checks didnt get deposited.
|
|
|
Post by Mark O on Jan 7, 2012 14:10:18 GMT 9
Mark - is there a copyright on this photo? Where did you find it? I want to add it to my NASA page. I'm pretty sure it's a NASA photo so that would make it okay. I've seen it posted all over including in black-and-white. It's from 1982, and has been published in books, websites, and in a bunch of blogs with several sources. I don't remember where I found it, but it's been in my photobucket for some time, and I picked it out for my "pix of the day" tonight!
|
|
|
Post by Mark O on Jan 7, 2012 14:14:25 GMT 9
would it be safe to assume that they are lightning hit points? 5 POINTS!!! Wouldn't that be a fun mission profile?!!
|
|
MOW
Administrator
Owner/Operator
Currently: Offline
Posts: 5,822
Location:
Joined: September 2003
Retired: USAF, Civil Service
|
Post by MOW on Jan 7, 2012 15:08:36 GMT 9
Mark - is there a copyright on this photo? Where did you find it? I want to add it to my NASA page. I'm pretty sure it's a NASA photo so that would make it okay. I've seen it posted all over including in black-and-white. It's from 1982, and has been published in books, websites, and in a bunch of blogs with several sources. I don't remember where I found it, but it's been in my photobucket for some time, and I picked it out for my "pix of the day" tonight! Excellent! Thanks Mark
|
|
MOW
Administrator
Owner/Operator
Currently: Offline
Posts: 5,822
Location:
Joined: September 2003
Retired: USAF, Civil Service
|
Post by MOW on Jan 7, 2012 15:10:54 GMT 9
would it be safe to assume that they are lighting hit points? Or was some whacko with a shot gun with big pellets just taking target practice, NAAAHHHH, maybe bird strikes, Turkey for the masses who couldnt afford to buy a dinner in Richmond, their checks didnt get deposited. As Mark says... 5 points, although it would have been 10 points if stated as "the resulting burn markings 'from' a lightening strike". The marks themselves are not the actual hits, but burn marks made from the strike as it went through the aircraft. Exit points maybe?
|
|
|
Post by Mark O on Jan 7, 2012 15:41:16 GMT 9
Thanks for clearing that up Pat. I should have been more specific. Sort of like saying, "It's not the fall that kills you, it's the sudden stop!"
|
|
MOW
Administrator
Owner/Operator
Currently: Offline
Posts: 5,822
Location:
Joined: September 2003
Retired: USAF, Civil Service
|
Post by MOW on Jan 7, 2012 16:39:47 GMT 9
Thanks for clearing that up Pat. I should have been more specific. Sort of like saying, "It's not the fall that kills you, it's the sudden stop!" :rofl just so everyone doesn't think it got hit my lightning that many times
|
|
|
Post by LBer1568 on Jan 12, 2012 1:59:50 GMT 9
Initial research flights started in 1980 and 1981 in the vicinity of the NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory in Norman, Oklahoma. The majority of the research flights were later flown in the vicinity of NASA Langley and the NASA Wallops Island Flight Facility. NASA 816 made 195 Storm Hazards research flights, made 1496 thunderstorm penetrations, and experienced 714 direct lightning strikes. Information and photo from the souvenir booklet issued by the NASA Langley Research Center in conjunction with the retirement of NASA 816 on 17 May 1991.
|
|
|
Post by LBer1568 on Jan 12, 2012 2:09:03 GMT 9
Two F-106Bs (57-2507 and 57-2516) were supplied to NASA for use as systems development aircraft. They were redesignated NF-106B and assigned the civilian registration numbers N607NA and N616NA respectively.
F-106B 57-2516 arrived at Lewis Research Center in October of 1966, where it was assigned the NASA number 616. It was used for research and development in support of supersonic transport engine inlet design. It was later modified with two additional jet engines mounted underneath the wings. 616 was transferred to the Dryden Flight Research Facility at Edwards AFB in January of 1979, where it was renumbered 816. This plane was later loaned to Langley, where it was modified by the Langley Research Center in 1979 to evaluate the effect of lightning strikes on aircraft. In 1988, it was fitted with Langley-designed and manufactured wing leading-edge vortex flaps in connection with the Advanced Technology Fighter program. This aircraft was retired on May 17, 1991 (the last flight having been flown on March 5 from Langley AFB in Virginia) and is awaiting a replacement. The aircraft is now display at the Virginia Air and SpaceCenter at Hampton.
In March of 1981, F-106A serial number 59-0123 was transferred to NASA at Langley to serve as a spare for 816.
F-106B 57-2507 arrived at Lewis in September of 1972, where it was assigned the number 607. It was used for solar cell and ocean color scanning tests, which were designed to be used in water and land quality evaluation. In May of 1981, 607 was transferred to Langley. It was cut in half in 1984 for use in full-scale wind tunnel testing.
F-106B 59-2545 arrived at Langley on January 30, 1985. It is a non-flyable aircraft used for various tests.
F-106B number 57-2513 was used as a Rockwell B-1 chase aircraft by the San Antonio Air Logistics Center at Kelly AFB in Texas.
|
|
MOW
Administrator
Owner/Operator
Currently: Offline
Posts: 5,822
Location:
Joined: September 2003
Retired: USAF, Civil Service
|
Post by MOW on Jan 12, 2012 5:30:43 GMT 9
Two F-106Bs (57-2507 and 57-2516) were supplied to NASA for use as systems development aircraft. They were redesignated NF-106B and assigned the civilian registration numbers N607NA and N616NA respectively. F-106B 57-2516 arrived at Lewis Research Center in October of 1966, where it was assigned the NASA number 616. It was used for research and development in support of supersonic transport engine inlet design. It was later modified with two additional jet engines mounted underneath the wings. 616 was transferred to the Dryden Flight Research Facility at Edwards AFB in January of 1979, where it was renumbered 816. This plane was later loaned to Langley, where it was modified by the Langley Research Center in 1979 to evaluate the effect of lightning strikes on aircraft. In 1988, it was fitted with Langley-designed and manufactured wing leading-edge vortex flaps in connection with the Advanced Technology Fighter program. This aircraft was retired on May 17, 1991 (the last flight having been flown on March 5 from Langley AFB in Virginia) and is awaiting a replacement. The aircraft is now display at the Virginia Air and SpaceCenter at Hampton. In March of 1981, F-106A serial number 59-0123 was transferred to NASA at Langley to serve as a spare for 816. F-106B 57-2507 arrived at Lewis in September of 1972, where it was assigned the number 607. It was used for solar cell and ocean color scanning tests, which were designed to be used in water and land quality evaluation. In May of 1981, 607 was transferred to Langley. It was cut in half in 1984 for use in full-scale wind tunnel testing. F-106B 59-2545 arrived at Langley on January 30, 1985. It is a non-flyable aircraft used for various tests. F-106B number 57-2513 was used as a Rockwell B-1 chase aircraft by the San Antonio Air Logistics Center at Kelly AFB in Texas. F-106B 57-2516 actually carried two different NASA designations while with NASA; N616NA while at the Lewis Research Center, Cleveland OH and then N816NA while performing in the NASA Storm Hazards Research Program at the Lewis Research Center, Cleveland OH. www.f-106deltadart.com/nasa_lightning_research.htmwww.f-106deltadart.com/nasa_airbreathing_propulsion_research.htmwww.f-106deltadart.com/nasa_gallery.htm
|
|
|
Post by Mark O on Jan 26, 2012 11:26:14 GMT 9
Here's an "other" Six pix. I like this one because it has the FOD screen (?) over the intake. Also note the paint coming off the tail of 458. A pretty cool photo! I found this 48th FIS shot on the interwebby. My notes tell me it was taken at Tyndall in October, 1973. Does anyone know the circumstances of this type of run? I see the pilot in the cockpit with helmet and (maybe) oxygen mask on, so my first thought was a launch, but obviously not with the intake screens.
|
|
Bullhunter
Global Moderator
318th FIS Jet Shop 1975-78
Currently: Offline
Posts: 7,445
Location:
Joined: May 2005
|
Post by Bullhunter on Jan 26, 2012 13:52:41 GMT 9
Thanks, been looking for a photo of engine run & screens.
|
|
|
Post by Mark O on Jan 26, 2012 14:03:01 GMT 9
Thanks, been looking for a photo of engine run & screens. Have you seen this photo? I found this last November looking through old issues of "The Spokesman Review", the local Spokane, WA newspaper that I found on Google. I sent this picture to Erv just before he passed, and he posted it on his site. www.convairf-106deltadart.com/57252003Page.html
|
|
marv2
F-106 Qualified
Currently: Offline
Posts: 73
Location:
Joined: April 2004
|
Post by marv2 on Jan 26, 2012 23:43:12 GMT 9
Mark, it very well could have been a launch. We put the engine screens up with the engine running on a regular basis during red balls and having to go up the ladder to the cockpit for instrument problems. It was also possible to remove them with the engine running.
|
|
|
Post by Mark O on Jan 27, 2012 11:07:54 GMT 9
Mark, it very well could have been a launch. We put the engine screens up with the engine running on a regular basis during red balls and having to go up the ladder to the cockpit for instrument problems. It was also possible to remove them with the engine running. Thanks Marv2!! That's the kind of info I love to hear from you guys! BTW, how heavy were those screens, and were they pretty easy to install/remove? I imagine they weren't to bad since you could do it with the engines running.
|
|