USN EA-6B ECMO
New to the Flightline
Retired Naval Flight Officer, EA-6B ECM Officer, VAQ-129 & VAQ-136, 1970-74
Currently: Offline
Posts: 4
Location:
Joined: January 2020
Retired: USN
|
Post by USN EA-6B ECMO on Jan 28, 2020 0:49:35 GMT 9
The F-106 IRST appears to have been a reasonably successful system based upon seeing a number of references to its being used during intercepts of high-altitude targets (ideal circumstances). The Navy's experience with IRST, with which I am more familiar from R&D analysis experience, appears to have been less positive. The IRST on both the F-4 and F-14 were ultimately deleted and efforts to improve performance fell short.
I'd like to know
1. how frequently was the IRST used in actual or exercise intercepts? 2. Was the IRST screen display recorded like that of the radar, when it was selected as the primary interception sensor? 3. The opinion of any Pilot who used the IRST during interceptions on its effectiveness?
Any help would be appreciated including literature on the subject. It seems there isn't much written about this pioneering IRST and it use.
Input from airmen who maintained the MA-1 system components, particularly the radar and IRST, would be especially appreciated. Comments and estimates on quantifying the benefits of incorporating solid-state electronics and closed cycle cooling of the IRST are very welcome.
|
|